Skip to main content

General Relativity Tutorial III: Coordinate Transformation and Covariant Derivative

In the previous tutorial, we explored the metric tensor and basis. In this tutorial, we will delve into the concept of tensors and their properties related to coordinate transformations. 

A tensor is a multidimensional array that obeys certain transformation rules under coordinate transformations. A vector is an example of a tensor, specifically one with rank 1. One of the key properties of a vector is that it possesses both magnitude and direction. The significance of direction lies in the fact that a vector can be transformed under a coordinate transformation. 

Let's consider the basis vectors denoted by $g_i$, which can be expressed as $g_i = \frac{\partial \vec{r}}{\partial x^i}$. We also have another basis, denoted by $g'_i=\frac{\partial \vec{r}}{\partial x'^i}$. 

By applying the chain rule, we can establish the following relationship between the two bases: 

$\frac{\partial \vec{r}}{\partial x^j} = \frac{\partial \vec{r}}{\partial x'^k} \frac{\partial x'k}{\partial x^j}  = g'_k \frac{\partial x'^k}{\partial x^j}$, 

Now, let's apply this coordinate transformation to two types of vectors: covariant and contravariant vectors. 


To do this, let's consider a vector $\vec{u}$. As we learned in the previous tutorial, we can express this vector in two different bases: one as $u^i g_i$ and the other as $u_i g^i$. Here, $u_i$ is called the contravariant component, and $u^i$ is the covariant component. 

Contravariant component: 


For the contravariant component, the coordinate transformation should satisfy the following relationship: 

$\vec{u} = u^i g_i = u'^k g'_k$ 

Hence, the contravariant component can be obtained as: 

$u^i g_i = u^i \frac{\partial x'^k}{\partial x^i} g'_k = u'^k g'_k$, which yields $u'^k = \frac{\partial x'^k}{\partial x^i} u^i$.


Covariant component:


On the other hand, for the covariant component, the coordinate transformation leads to:


$\vec{u} = u_j g^j = u'_k g'^k$,


which can be written as:


$ u_j g^j g'_i =  u'_k g'^k g'_i $  $\Rightarrow u_j \frac{\partial x^j}{\partial x'^i}  = u'_k \delta'^k_i = u'_i$.


Therefore, we find: 


$ u'_i = u_j \frac{\partial x^j}{\partial x'^i}$. 



Consequently, the two components transform differently under coordinate transformations. Now, what about a rank-2 tensor? Let's consider the relation between $T^{kl}$ and $T'^{ij}$. The contravariant components $T^{kl}$ of the rank-2 tensor should transform as follows:


$T'^{ij} = \frac{\partial x'^i}{\partial x^k} \frac{\partial x'^j}{\partial x^l} T^{kl}$.


This equation describes the transformation of rank-2 tensor components. Tensors must satisfy this transformation rule. The reason why this relation is important is that the laws of physics should remain unchanged under coordinate transformations. For instance, let's consider Newton's Second Law, $\vec{F} = m\vec{a}$. 


If we change the coordinate system, the equation can be written as $\vec{F'} = m \vec{a}'$. Both of these vector equations should satisfy the coordinate transformation, ensuring that the laws of physics can be described from different observers' perspectives while still maintaining their validity. 


Einstein also considered this mathematical structure of coordinate transformations. His field equations in general relativity are described using rank-2 tensors. However, before explaining those equations, it is important to consider another significant property of tensors.


Derivative of tensor is NOT a tensor


Let's consider the derivative of a tensor and its coordinate transformation:


$\partial_\nu A^\mu \longrightarrow \partial'_\nu A'^\mu$.


We would expect the coordinate transformation to be given by:


$\partial_\nu A^\mu = \frac{\partial x^\lambda}{\partial x'^\nu} \frac{\partial x'^\mu}{\partial x^\rho} \partial_\lambda A^\rho $.


Unfortunately, when we calculate the derivative term, we encounter an issue:  


$ \partial'_\nu A'^\mu = \frac{\partial}{\partial x'^\nu} \left( \frac{\partial x'^\mu}{\partial x^\rho} A^\rho \right) = \frac{\partial x^\lambda}{\partial x'^\nu} \frac{\partial x'^\mu }{\partial x^\rho} \partial_\lambda A^\rho + \frac{\partial^2 x'^\mu}{\partial x'^\nu \partial x^\rho} A^\rho$.


The additional term that appears breaks the coordinate transformation of the given vector. Therefore, the derivative of a tensor is not a tensor because it fails to satisfy the coordinate transformation.


Covariant Derivative


To overcome this problem, we introduce the concept of the covariant derivative:


$D_\mu A^\nu = \partial_\mu A^\nu - \Gamma^\nu_{\mu \lambda} A^\lambda $, 


here $\Gamma^\nu_{\mu \lambda}$ is defined as the `Christoffel symbol' and is given by:


$\Gamma^\nu_{\mu \lambda} = \frac{1}{2} g^{\nu \rho} [ \partial_\lambda g_{\mu \rho} + \partial_\mu g_{\lambda \rho} - \partial_\rho g_{\mu \lambda}$ ].


The inclusion of the Christoffel symbol plays a crucial role in eliminating the extraneous term that arises during the coordinate transformation of the derivative vector. Consequently, the covariant derivative ensures the preservation of coordinate transformations, thus maintaining its consistency with tensor analysis. It is worth noting that the covariant derivative corresponds to the first derivative in tensor analysis, while the concept of the second derivative will be further elucidated in our upcoming tutorial.


Then, let us meet at the next tutorial as we delve deeper into the intricacies of tensors and their fascinating properties for Einstein Field equations.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Unraveling the W-Boson Mass Anomaly: Challenging the Standard Model and Expanding Our Understanding of the Universe

Welcome to the captivating world of particle physics, where scientists tirelessly probe the fundamental building blocks of our universe. In a groundbreaking discovery, the esteemed CDF (Collider Detector at Fermilab) collaboration has recently unveiled a perplexing mystery surrounding the mass of the W-boson [1]. Join us as we embark on a journey through their remarkable research findings, which challenge the long-held expectations of the standard model of particle physics. In this blog post, we will explore the significance of the W-boson mass anomaly and the profound implications it holds for our understanding of the universe. The Standard Model and the Missing Piece: A Puzzle Completed The standard model of particle physics stands as a remarkable framework, providing insights into the fundamental forces and particles that underpin our reality. However, until recently, a crucial piece of this intricate puzzle eluded scientists—the Higgs boson. In 2012, the discovery of the elusive Hi...

LK-99 Article: Studies by Beihang University and CSIR-National Physical Laboratory

The recent claim of ambient-pressure room-temperature superconductivity in LK-99 has generated significant excitement and attention within the scientific community. In this blog post, we will explore the findings of two research teams from Beihang University in China and CSIR-National Physical Laboratory in India, who conducted cross-verifications to ascertain the superconducting nature of LK-99. Before delving into those research results, let's first understand the basic concept of superconductors.  What are the requirements to be a superconductor?  Superconductors exhibit two crucial properties: zero electrical resistance below a certain transition temperature and the Meissner effect, which excludes external magnetic fields from the superconductor.  1) Zero Electrical Resistance:  In regular conductors like copper wires, we encounter electrical resistance, which leads to energy loss and scattering of electrons as they move through the material. However, in superc...